TITLE 7. BANKING AND SECURITIES

PART 6. CREDIT UNION DEPARTMENT

CHAPTER 91. CHARTERING, OPERATIONS, MERGERS, LIQUIDATIONS

SUBCHAPTER E. DIRECTION OF AFFAIRS

7 TAC §91.501, §91.502

The Credit Union Commission proposes amendments to §91.501, Director Eligibility and Disqualification, and §91.502, Director/Committee Member Fees, Insurance, Reimbursable Expenses, and Other Authorized Expenditures.

EXPLANATION OF AND JUSTIFICATION FOR THE RULES. The proposed amendments were identified as a part of the Credit Union Department's quadrennial rule review process. The amendments to §91.501 would add flexibility to the recordkeeping requirement for applications of new directors. The amendments to §91.502 would update the title of a rule referenced in the section.

COST TO REGULATED PERSONS. This rule proposal is not subject to Texas Government Code §2001.0045 concerning increasing costs to regulated persons because this agency is a self-directed semi-independent (SDSI) agency under Finance Code Chapter 16 and is therefore exempt under §2001.0045(c)(8).

GOVERNMENT GROWTH IMPACT STATEMENT. In compliance with Texas Government Code §2001.0221, the Department has prepared a government growth impact statement.

For each year of the first five years that the rules as amended will be in effect, the rules will not:

--create or eliminate a government program;

--require the creation of new employee positions or the elimination of existing employee positions;

--require an increase or decrease in future legislative appropriations to the Department;

--require an increase or decrease in fees paid to the Department;

--create new regulations;

--expand, limit, or repeal existing regulations;

--increase or decrease the number of individuals subject to the rule's applicability;

--positively or adversely affect this state's economy.

ENVIRONMENTAL RULE ANALYSIS. The proposed rules are not "major environmental rules" as defined by Government Code §2001.0225. The proposed rules are not specifically intended to protect the environment or to reduce risks to human health from environmental exposure. Therefore, a regulatory environmental analysis is not required.

FISCAL IMPACT ON STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS. Robert Etheridge, Commissioner, has determined that for the first five-year period the proposed amendments are in effect, there are no reasonably foreseeable implications relating to cost or revenues of state or local governments under Government Code §2001.024(a)(4) as a result of enforcing or administering these amendments as proposed.

PUBLIC BENEFIT/COST NOTE. Mr. Etheridge has determined, pursuant to Government Code §2001.024(a)(5), that for the first five-year period the amended rules are in effect, the public benefit of the amendments to §91.501 is streamlined recordkeeping by credit unions, and the public benefit of the amendments to §91.502 is accuracy in the rule. He has further determined there will be no probable economic cost to the credit union system or to persons required to comply with the rules.

IMPACT ON LOCAL EMPLOYMENT OR ECONOMY. There is no reasonably anticipated effect on a local economy for the first five years that the proposed amendments are in effect. Therefore, no economic impact statement, local employment impact statement, or regulatory flexibility analysis is required under Texas Government Code §§2001.022 or 2001.024(a)(6).

ECONOMIC IMPACT STATEMENT AND REGULATORY FLEXIBILITY ANALYSIS FOR SMALL BUSINESSES, MICROBUSINESSES, AND RURAL COMMUNITIES. Mr. Etheridge has also determined that for each year of the first five years the proposed amendments are in effect, there will be no reasonably forecasted adverse economic effect on small businesses, micro-businesses, or rural communities as a result of implementing these amendments, and, therefore, no regulatory flexibility analysis, as specified in Texas Government Code §2006.002, is required.

TAKINGS IMPACT ASSESSMENT. No private real property interests are affected by this proposal, and the proposal does not restrict or limit an owner's right to his or her property that would otherwise exist in the absence of government action. Therefore, the amendments do not constitute a taking under Texas Government Code §2007.043.

REQUEST FOR PUBLIC COMMENT. The Department is requesting public comments on the proposed amendments and information related to the cost, benefit, or effect of the proposed rules, including any applicable data, research, or analysis, from any person required to comply with the proposed rule or any other interested person. Please include an explanation of how and why the submitted information is specific to the proposed rules. Please do not submit copyrighted, confidential, or proprietary information. Written comments on the proposed amendments may be submitted in writing to Devon Bijansky, General Counsel, Credit Union Department, 914 East Anderson Lane, Austin, Texas 78752-1699 or by email to CUDMail@cud.texas.gov. To be considered, a written comment must be received within 30 days after publication of the proposal in the Texas Register.

STATUTORY AUTHORITY. The amendments are proposed pursuant to Texas Finance Code §15.402, which authorizes the Commission to adopt reasonable rules for administering Title 2, Chapter 15 and Title 3, Subtitle D of the Texas Finance Code, particularly §122.053, which sets forth the duties of directors; §122.054, which directs the commission to establish qualifications for a director and §122.062, which limits the compensation a director may receive for services.

STATUTORY SECTIONS AFFECTED. The specific sections affected by the amendments are Texas Finance Code §§122.053, 122.054, and 122.062.

§91.501. Director Eligibility and Disqualification.

(a) - (b) (No change.)

(c) Director application. Any member nominated for, or seeking election to, the board of directors shall submit a written application in such form as the credit union may prescribe. The application shall be submitted either to the nominating committee prior to its selection of nominees; or to the board chair within 30 days following the election of a member who was not nominated by the nominating committee or who was appointed by the board to fill a vacancy. The applications of the elected/appointed directors shall be incorporated into and made part of the minutes of either the first board meeting immediately preceding [following] the election/appointment of those directors or the first board meeting following the election/appointment. Applications of unsuccessful candidates shall be destroyed or returned upon request. The commissioner may review and require that changes be made to any application form, which is deemed inadequate or unfairly discriminates against certain classes of members.

(d) - (g) (No change.)

§91.502. Director/Committee Member Fees, Insurance, Reimbursable Expenses, and Other Authorized Expenditures.

(a) Expense reimbursement. A credit union may reimburse out-of-pocket travel and related expenses that are reasonable and appropriate for the business activity undertaken. A credit union shall adopt a written board policy to administer and control travel expenses paid or incurred in connection with directors or committee members carrying out official credit union business.

(b) Payment of fees. Subject to the provisions of this rule, a credit union may pay a reasonable meeting fee to any of its directors, honorary directors, advisory directors, (hereafter referred to as directors) or committee members for attending duly called meetings at which appropriate credit union business is conducted. Any credit union electing to pay any type of meeting fee shall annually disclose to the membership the fees paid in the prior calendar year and scheduled to be paid in the current calendar year. This disclosure may be provided to the members as part of the credit union's annual report as prescribed in §91.310 of this title (relating to Annual Report to Membership [annual report to membership]). A credit union, however, may not pay any meeting fees to a director or committee member if the credit union is operating under a Net Worth Restoration Plan; or an order issued under Finance Code §122.257 or §122.258.

(c) Enforcement Authority; Prohibition. The commissioner may prohibit or otherwise limit or restrict the payment of meeting fees to directors or committee members if, in the opinion of the commissioner, the credit union has paid, is paying, or is about to pay meeting fees that are excessive as defined in subsection (f) of this section.

(d) Use of credit union equipment. A credit union may provide personal computers, access to electronic mail, and other electronic conveniences to directors during their terms of office provided:

(1) the board of directors determines that the equipment and the electronic means are necessary and appropriate for the directors to fulfill their duties and responsibilities;

(2) the board of directors develops and maintains written policies and procedures regarding this matter; and

(3) the arrangement ceases immediately upon the person's leaving office.

(e) Insurance. A credit union may, in accordance with written board policy, provide health, life, accident, liability, or similar personal insurance protection for directors and committee members. The kind and amount of these insurance protections must be reasonable given the credit union's size, financial condition, and the duties of the director or committee member. The insurance protection must cease upon the director or committee member's leaving office, without providing residual benefits beyond those earned during the individual's term on the board or committee.

(f) Review by board. A credit union shall implement and maintain appropriate controls and other safeguards to prevent the payment of fees or expenses that are excessive or that could lead to material financial loss to the institution. At least annually, the board, in good faith, shall review the director/committee member fees and director/committee member-related expenses incurred, paid or reimbursed by the credit union and determine whether its policy continues to be in the best interest of the credit union. The Board's review shall be included as part of the minutes of the meeting at which the policy and the fees and expenses were studied. Fees and expenses shall be considered excessive when amounts paid are disproportionate to the services performed by a director or committee member, or unreasonable considering the financial condition of the institution and similar practices at credit unions of a comparable asset size, geographic location, and/or operational complexity.

(g) Guest travel. A credit union's board may authorize the payment of travel expenses that are reasonable in relation to the credit union's financial condition and resources for one guest accompanying a director or committee member to an approved conference or educational program. The payment will not be considered compensation for purposes of Finance Code §122.062 if:

(1) it is determined by the board to be necessary or appropriate in order to carry out the official business of the credit union; and

(2) it is in accordance with written board policies and procedures.

The agency certifies that legal counsel has reviewed the proposal and found it to be within the state agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on August 7, 2026.

TRD-202603350

Robert Etheridge

Commissioner

Credit Union Department

Earliest possible date of adoption: September 20, 2026

For further information, please call: (512) 837-9236


SUBCHAPTER F. ACCOUNTS AND SERVICES

7 TAC §91.608, §91.610

The Credit Union Commission proposes amendments to §91.608, Confidentiality of Member Records; and §91.610, Safe Deposit Box Facilities.

EXPLANATION OF AND JUSTIFICATION FOR THE RULES. The proposed amendments were identified as a part of the Credit Union Department's quadrennial rule review process. The amendments to §91.608 would update a reference to the federal regulations. The amendments to §91.610 would update the references to the statute regarding imprinting of safe deposit keys to Chapter 125 of the Finance Code, which relates to credit unions, instead of Chapter 59, which relates to banks, and would delete certain provisions that are duplicative of or in conflict with the statute.

COST TO REGULATED PERSONS. This rule proposal is not subject to Texas Government Code §2001.0045 concerning increasing costs to regulated persons because this agency is a self-directed semi-independent (SDSI) agency under Finance Code Chapter 16 and is therefore exempt under §2001.0045(c)(8).

GOVERNMENT GROWTH IMPACT STATEMENT. In compliance with Texas Government Code §2001.0221, the Department has prepared a government growth impact statement.

For each year of the first five years that the rules as amended will be in effect, the rules will not:

--create or eliminate a government program;

--require the creation of new employee positions or the elimination of existing employee positions;

--require an increase or decrease in future legislative appropriations to the Department;

--require an increase or decrease in fees paid to the Department;

--create new regulations;

--expand, limit, or repeal existing regulations;

--increase or decrease the number of individuals subject to the rule's applicability;

--positively or adversely affect this state's economy.

ENVIRONMENTAL RULE ANALYSIS. The proposed rules are not "major environmental rules" as defined by Government Code §2001.0225. The proposed rules are not specifically intended to protect the environment or to reduce risks to human health from environmental exposure. Therefore, a regulatory environmental analysis is not required.

FISCAL IMPACT ON STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS. Robert Etheridge, Commissioner, has determined that for the first five-year period the proposed amendments are in effect, there are no reasonably foreseeable implications relating to cost or revenues of state or local governments under Government Code §2001.024(a)(4) as a result of enforcing or administering these amendments as proposed.

PUBLIC BENEFIT/COST NOTE. Mr. Etheridge has determined, pursuant to Government Code §2001.024(a)(5), that for the first five-year period the amended rules are in effect, the public benefit of the amendments is accuracy and conciseness of the rules. He has further determined there will be no probable economic cost to the credit union system or to persons required to comply with the rules.

IMPACT ON LOCAL EMPLOYMENT OR ECONOMY. There is no reasonably anticipated effect on a local economy for the first five years that the proposed amendments are in effect. Therefore, no economic impact statement, local employment impact statement, or regulatory flexibility analysis is required under Texas Government Code §§2001.022 or 2001.024(a)(6).

ECONOMIC IMPACT STATEMENT AND REGULATORY FLEXIBILITY ANALYSIS FOR SMALL BUSINESSES, MICROBUSINESSES, AND RURAL COMMUNITIES. Mr. Etheridge has also determined that for each year of the first five years the proposed amendments are in effect, there will be no reasonably forecasted adverse economic effect on small businesses, micro-businesses, or rural communities as a result of implementing these amendments, and, therefore, no regulatory flexibility analysis, as specified in Texas Government Code §2006.002, is required.

TAKINGS IMPACT ASSESSMENT. No private real property interests are affected by this proposal, and the proposal does not restrict or limit an owner's right to his or her property that would otherwise exist in the absence of government action. Therefore, the amendments do not constitute a taking under Texas Government Code §2007.043.

REQUEST FOR PUBLIC COMMENT. The Department is requesting public comments on the proposed amendments and information related to the cost, benefit, or effect of the proposed rules, including any applicable data, research, or analysis, from any person required to comply with the proposed rule or any other interested person. Please include an explanation of how and why the submitted information is specific to the proposed rules. Please do not submit copyrighted, confidential, or proprietary information. Written comments on the proposed amendments may be submitted in writing to Devon Bijansky, General Counsel, Credit Union Department, 914 East Anderson Lane, Austin, Texas 78752-1699 or by email to CUDMail@cud.texas.gov. To be considered, a written comment must be received within 30 days after publication of the proposal in the Texas Register.

STATUTORY AUTHORITY. The amendments are proposed pursuant to Texas Finance Code §15.402, which authorizes the Commission to adopt reasonable rules for administering Title 2, Chapter 15 and Title 3, Subtitle D (Chapters 121 through 149) of the Texas Finance Code; particularly §§125.402, which authorizes the Commission to adopt reasonable rules relating to confidentiality and disclosure of members' information, and 125.508, which establishes requirements related to imprinting of safe deposit box keys.

STATUTORY SECTIONS AFFECTED. The specific sections affected by the amendments are Texas Finance Code §§122.053, 122.054, 122.062, 125.402, and 125.508.

§91.608. Confidentiality of Member Records.

(a) - (b) (No change.)

(c) Privacy policy. Each credit union shall develop, implement and maintain a written policy on the protection of nonpublic personal information of individual members in its possession. This policy shall be consistent with the disclosure and reporting requirements applicable to federally insured credit unions as addressed in 12 C.F.R. part 1016 (Part 1016 of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau regulations) [Part 716 of NCUA Rules and Regulations].

(d) (No change.)

§91.610. Safe Deposit Box Facilities.

(a) Purpose. Finance Code §125.508 [§59.110] requires credit unions to imprint keys issued to safe deposit boxes with the institution's routing number. In addition, it requires a report to the Department of Public Safety if the routing number is altered or defaced so that the correct routing number is illegible. The purpose of this section is to clarify the requirements of the noted section of the Finance Code.

(b) Definitions. The following words and terms, when used in this section, shall have the following meanings, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise.

(1) Credit union--This term includes all state or federal credit unions that have been assigned a routing number unique to that institution.

(2) Routing number--The number printed on the face of a share draft or check in fractional form or in nine-digit form that identifies a paying financial institution.

(c) Imprinting requirements. A credit union which has been issued a routing number shall imprint that routing number on safe deposit box keys on either the head of the key or the shank of the key if there is adequate room. The typical locations to be used are indicated in the following instructions and diagram. The imprint can be made anywhere on the key that has the required space available. When positioning the die on the key, be careful to place the die on the key where it will imprint on a flat surface and not in the area of the key cuts or on any of the shank ridges or grooves. Imprinting in these areas may interfere with the proper working of the key in the lock and may cause damage. In the event these standard areas for the location of the imprint are unavailable, either because of grooves on the key shank or the fact that the head of the key already has names and other numbers imprinted on it, then the credit union may attach to the key a tag imprinted with the routing number. The tag used must be of such a nature as to be secure. Thus, a paper or cardboard tag or a tag affixed with string will not be acceptable. However, any other medium such as plastic or metal which can retain an imprint of a number shall be acceptable. The tag may be attached in any way to assure its affixation to the key. Typically, this will mean inserting the tag or a device to affix the tag through the hole in the head of the key normally used for placing keys on key chains. The tag method shall not be used if there is adequate room on the key itself for imprinting the numbers. There are four standard areas for the location of the imprinted routing number. These include: the head of the key, the shank of the key, and either place on the reverse side of the key. The standard imprint areas are shown as follows.

Figure: 7 TAC §91.610(c) (No change.)

(d) Branch designation. A credit union may, but is not required to, add a three-digit branch designation to its routing number. Thus, the main credit union facility should receive the designation "001" and branch facilities should receive numbers consecutively beginning with "002" with successive numbers as needed. However, the credit union may control the branch numbering system used provided that the credit union maintains a master list of branch designations used for this purpose. The master list should be maintained at the main office of the credit union and shall include the three-digit branch designation and address of facility. The credit union then may imprint safe deposit box keys or tags with the routing number plus three-digit branch designation for full identification of the facility.

(e) Report of defaced or altered key. A credit union that submits a report to the Department of Public Safety pursuant to Finance Code §125.508 shall retain a copy of the report for a period of three years. [Within 10 days after an officer or employee of a credit union observes that a key used to access a safe deposit box has had the routing number altered or defaced or the tag removed, a report shall be prepared of such incident. The report shall be on a form promulgated by the Credit Union Department in the form of the attached Exhibit A. The report should be submitted to the Department of Public Safety, Attention: Criminal Law Enforcement, Box 4087, Austin, Texas 78773-0001. The report should be mailed no later than ten days after the incident. The credit union should retain one copy of the incident report for a period of three years. Nothing in this rule nor in the Finance Code §59.110 shall require a credit union to inspect routing numbers imprinted on a key or an attached tag to determine if the number has been altered or defaced.]

(f) Effective date; applicability to existing keys. A credit union must imprint all safe deposit box keys on or after September 1, 1992. Additionally, the imprinting requirement applies to all keys issued prior to September 1, 1992. However, keys for boxes rented prior to September 1, 1992, need not be imprinted with the routing number unless and until a member presents a safe deposit box key at a credit union for access to a box. Nothing in this rule or the Finance Code §125.508 [§59.110] shall be construed to require a credit union to provide notice to its safe deposit box users or to otherwise require such members to present their keys for imprinting. However, on the first date after September 1, 1992, that a member presents a key which has not been imprinted, the credit union shall imprint the key with the routing numbers as required by Finance Code §125.508 [§59.110].

(g) Effect of change in routing number. In the event a credit union's routing number is changed as a result of a merger, acquisition, or other change, safe deposit box keys need not be replaced with a new routing number provided that the credit union maintains a master list of the routing numbers used to imprint keys.

[Figure: 7 TAC §91.610(g)]

The agency certifies that legal counsel has reviewed the proposal and found it to be within the state agency's legal authority to adopt.

Filed with the Office of the Secretary of State on August 7, 2026.

TRD-202603352

Robert Etheridge

Commissioner

Credit Union Department

Earliest possible date of adoption: September 20, 2026

For further information, please call: (512) 837-9236